Justice Shekhar Yadav is facing strong opposition from the INDI Alliance for hailing the era of majority politics. The INDI Alliance has escalated its attack on Bharat’s majority by declaring war on Shekhar Yadav himself. National Conference leader Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi announced an impeachment motion against Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court.
The alleged charge? Justice Yadav’s remarks support the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) and advocate for social harmony, gender equality, and secularism. This impeachment attempt exposes INDI Alliance’s larger contempt for Bharat’s Hindu majority. Their selective outrage now targets judiciary members for simply speaking the truth.
Impeachment Motion Against Shekhar Yadav By INDI Alliance
On Tuesday, Mehdi declared his intent to initiate impeachment proceedings under Article 124(4) of the Constitution. He accused Justice Shekhar Yadav of delivering “hate speech” at a Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) event. Mehdi claims support from seven opposition MPs and is lobbying Congress, Samajwadi Party, DMK, and TMC leaders to secure the required 100 signatures for his motion.
The Indi Block is planning to bring a Motion in LS and RS to Impeach Judge Shekhar Kumar Yadav who supported Hindus and Majority
While all Hindus are supporting him, Indi Block stands exposed on the fact that they can’t digest a Judge Supporting THE MAJORITY COMMUNITY IN BHARAT pic.twitter.com/2D3Bie9d35
— The Jaipur Dialogues (@JaipurDialogues) December 12, 2024
In his address, Yadav supported the UCC and stated, “The law should represent the majority to uphold secularism.”
🚨 BIG BREAKING NEWS
After No Confidence Motion against Jagdeep Dhankhar, now INDI alliance is set to move 'IMPEACHMENT' proceedings against Justice Shekhar Yadav in Loksabha & Rajyasabha.
Speaking for Hindus is a Crime? INDI's frustration is at its peak..! pic.twitter.com/pGLEeFlmke
— Megh Updates 🚨™ (@MeghUpdates) December 12, 2024
The videos of Justice Yadav’s speech at the VHP convention are viral online. And the opposition leaders quickly labeled this as “hate speech.” But is this judicial impartiality under attack, or a targeted campaign to suppress pro-Hindu voices?
Legal Context: What Impeachment Demands!
As Opposition goes for impeaching Allahabad HC judge Shekhar Kumar Yadav for his comments on Hindu nation, a sobering look at previous such impeachments – from Justice Ramaswamy in 1993 to CJI Dipak Misra in 2017, all failed. Only in case of Justice Soumitra Sen in Calcutta HC,… pic.twitter.com/KRbArLAQXy
— Nalin Mehta (@nalinmehta) December 12, 2024
The process to impeach a sitting judge is stringent. Article 124(4) mandates “proved misbehavior or incapacity.” A motion must pass through both houses of Parliament with a two-thirds majority. And lastly, the President of Bharat must sign the impeachment passed in the Parliament. Justice Shekhar Yadav’s speech does not fulfill the criteria of “hate-specch”. Discussing the UCC at a legal seminar is far from “proven misbehavior.”
Legal experts argue that Justice Yadav’s statements align with Constitutional values.
UCC advocates gender equality, which is a fundamental right. Additionally, it allows the law to rule all citizens, irrespective of their religion. The entire movement against UCC is by the Mullah lobby. The UCC shall take away the tight-fisted rule of the Mullah in the Muslim community. Thereby, rendering them as religious heads instead of community leaders. Hence, supporting the UCC will not harm any citizens. Instead, it allows justice to be equal irrespective of religion, caste, creed, or gender to Indians. Thus, labeling his words as “hate speech” reflects the ideological desperation of INDI Alliance rather than legal merit.
BIG: INDI Alliance is likely to bring an IMPEACHMENT motion against Justice Shekhar Yadav 😳
~ 🗣️: "I have no hesitation in using the word KATHMULLAS. Because they are DANGEROUS for the country. They incite the public & work against Nation's Progress."🔥
What wrong did he say? pic.twitter.com/LaiFduKcTj
— The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️) (@Indian_Analyzer) December 12, 2024
INDI Alliance’s Contempt for Hindu Majority
We need to stand rock solid with Justice Shekhar Yadav
I have heard his full 30 mins speech. He didn't say anything wrong. His speech was very balanced and factual
Left ecosystem has created a biased public discourse in India in the last 70 years and they want everyone to… pic.twitter.com/sgqJADTSeK
— STAR Boy TARUN (@Starboy2079) December 11, 2024
This impeachment motion is mere optics to keep pressure on pro-UCC voices. However, it also gives a side benefit of suppressing pro-Hindu voices. The impeachment motion follows the INDI Alliance pattern of rejecting democratic mandates, powered by Hindu interests. From challenging NDA’s victories in the general election to opposing state-level pro-BJP mandates in Haryana and Maharashtra, the INDI Alliance consistently undermines the majority’s will.
Opposition members of the INDIA bloc are preparing to give notices to move impeachment proceedings in both houses of parliament against Allahabad high court Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav, who delivered a communal speech endorsing extremist Hindutva views at an event organised by… pic.twitter.com/0ewSHf8pH0
— sansadflix (@sansadflix) December 12, 2024
Unfortunately, their contempt extends to judiciary members who speak on a positive note on UCC in Bharat. Justice Shekhar Yadav’s speech is an example of honest discourse. But instead of debate, the INDI Alliance resorts to vilification campaigns to appease its minority vote bank.
Final Thoughts on Shekhar Yadav and INDI Alliance
The impeachment motion against Justice Shekhar Yadav is more than an attack on one judge. It symbolizes the INDI Alliance’s intolerance for voices that speak for Bharat’s majority. Their disdain for democratic mandates, combined with their anti-Hindu rhetoric, highlights their dangerous political strategy.
The judiciary must remain independent and free to express views rooted in Constitutional principles. Impeaching a judge for advocating equality and harmony sets a dangerous precedent. It’s time Bharat’s majority recognized this war on its values and stood united against such divisive politics.