Yoga, an ancient practice rooted in physical and spiritual well-being, has been embraced globally for its health benefits. However, the SGPC has deemed it inappropriate within the sacred confines of the Golden Temple. It cited concerns over religious protocol. This move by the SGPC has sparked outrage and raised questions about religious tolerance and freedom of expression.
Double Standards of SGPC: Namaz vs. Yoga
A glaring disparity emerges when one compares the SGPC’s stance on yoga with its approach towards other practices within the Golden Temple complex. Namaz, the Islamic prayer, is permitted and accommodated within the same premises. This differential treatment raises significant questions about consistency and fairness in managing religious activities.
While Namaz is rightfully respected as an expression of religious devotion, the SGPC’s decision to penalize the woman for performing yoga highlights an inconsistency in its approach. Such actions reflect a narrow interpretation of religious principles and a disregard for the diversity of spiritual practices that coexist harmoniously in today’s interconnected world.
Historical Amnesia & Religious Tolerance SGPC
The controversy also highlights deeper historical narratives and contemporary realities. Khalistanis mentioning their stance on yoga and Islam invokes a complex history of regional politics and identity.
The Sikh Gurus themselves faced persecution and martyrdom under Muslim rulers. Sikhism’s teachings emphasize inclusivity, compassion, and respect for all faiths. Therefore, condemning practices like yoga under the guise of religious purity is unacceptable! It disregards Sikhism’s broader principles and rich legacy of tolerance.
SGPC’s decision to sue a woman for yoga in the Golden Temple premises reflects SGPC’s anti-Hindu stance. Allowing Namaz while penalizing yoga perpetuates double standards!