In a move that has sent shockwaves across the globe, the Canadian Parliament’s silence on the death anniversary of notorious Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar has ignited a firestorm of controversy. The decision to remain mute on this date has been perceived by many as an alarming nod to extremist elements. It has stirred outrage and disbelief among the international community, particularly in India.
The Khalistani, Hardeep Singh Nijjar
Hardeep Singh Nijjar was a known figurehead in the Khalistani movement. It was far from a benign activist. His violent ideology and actions have been linked to numerous terrorist activities aimed at destabilizing India. The Khalistan movement, which seeks to establish an independent Sikh state, has long been associated with extremism and violence. Nijjar’s death, while controversial, is widely seen as a significant blow to terrorist networks.
Canadian Parliament Supports Terrorists!
On the anniversary of Nijjar’s demise, Canadian lawmakers chose to honour him instead of denouncing his actions or reaffirming their stance against terrorism. Their act suggests a tacit endorsement of Nijjar’s violent legacy! It is an unsettling signal that emboldens other radical elements within and beyond Canada’s borders.
Adding fuel to the fire, a group of Khalistani supporters took to the streets in Vancouver. They staged protests near the Indian consulate. They chanted provocatively and displayed support for Nijjar and the Khalistan movement, sending a chilling message of defiance and radicalism. Their protest, while peaceful on the surface, carried an undercurrent of intimidation and hostility aimed directly at the Indian diplomatic mission.
India Registers Its Protest
The international community, particularly India, swiftly condemned these developments. Indian officials expressed deep concern over Canada’s apparent leniency towards Khalistani elements and urged the Canadian government to take a firmer stance against terrorism in all its forms. Canadian legislators’ silence, combined with vocal and visible support from extremist groups, paints a troubling picture of Canada’s approach to counterterrorism.
Critics argue that this silence is not merely a diplomatic misstep but a dangerous precedent that undermines global anti-terrorism efforts. By failing to denounce Nijjar and his violent ideology, Canada risks becoming a haven for radical elements seeking legitimacy and support. This perceived sanctuary emboldens terrorists, compromises international security, and strains diplomatic relations with nations committed to combating terrorism.
Hardeep Singh Nijjar Is Just The Beginning….
Canadian Parliament’s silence is more than a mere oversight. It is a glaring omission that raises questions about the country’s commitment to global security and the fight against terrorism. As the world watches, Canada must reconsider its stance and take decisive action to affirm its opposition to all forms of extremism. The international community demands clarity and conviction in the face of terrorism.
Canadian leaders must break their silence and unequivocally condemn the actions and ideologies of Hardeep Singh Nijjar and his supporters. Anything less gravely disservices global peace and security.