Upholding Individual Rights: Freedom to Practice Faith
Judge Rohit Ranjan Agarwal’s bench affirmed the constitutional guarantee of individual religious freedom. It stresses every person’s right to freely profess, practice, and propagate their faith. This fundamental right is enshrined in Article 25 of the Indian Constitution. It ensures that individuals have the autonomy to choose their beliefs without interference.
Limits on Proselytization: No Collective Right to Convert
However, the court made it clear that this right does not extend to a collective right to proselytize. That is attempting to convert others by force, fraud or inducement. The ruling underscores the state’s responsibility to protect individuals from coerced religious conversions. It is outlined in the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021.
Case in Question: Allegations of Forced Conversions
The case revolved around allegations that Shriniwas Rav Nayak and others coerced a villager. They promised him a better life and solutions to personal problems in exchange for converting to Christianity. The prosecution argued that such practices violate the essence of religious freedom and undermine the voluntary nature of religious beliefs.
Judicial Stance: Denial of Bail and Legislative Intent
Despite Nayak’s plea of innocence and challenges to witness credibility, the court ruled against granting bail, citing substantial evidence of his involvement in an organized conversion effort. This decision aligns with the legislative intent behind the 2021 Act, which aims to curb unlawful conversions and protect vulnerable communities from exploitation.
Legal Precedent
The Allahabad High Court’s decision resonates beyond the courtroom, highlighting the delicate balance between religious freedom and public order. It underscores the imperative for legislative measures that safeguard individual autonomy in matters of faith while preventing coercive practices that disrupt societal harmony.
Constitutional Values Against Forced Conversions
As India navigates complex issues surrounding religious conversion, the ruling serves as a critical reminder of the constitutional principles that uphold religious harmony and individual rights. It calls for a nuanced approach that respects religious diversity while ensuring the rule of law prevails in protecting citizens’ freedoms.