When Congress’s Kerala spokesperson, Dr. Jinto John, equated Lord Krishna with adultery on live television, he didn’t just “misspeak.” It takes a special level of Hinduphobia to mock Hindu Gods while you wear a Congressi Hat and pretend to be an intellectual. Jinto John revealed the rotten marrow of Congress politics — where mocking Hindu gods is sport, and Hinduphobia is intellectual fashion.
However, this isn’t the first or last time a Congress leader spat on the Hindu faith, but it may be one of the most venomous.
Dear Jinto John, Shri Krishna Was Never Adulterous
Congress wants to project Lord Krishna as immoral. From misrepresenting the Kadam Tree incident to his offering the protection of his name to 16,000 women, they misuse Shri Krishna’s name for their Hinduphobic rhetoric! However, the scriptures tell a very different story.
- In the Bhagavata Purana (Canto 10, Chapter 29) – Shri Krishna tests the gopis’ devotion. He warns them about abandoning duties – not encouraging adultery.
- The Raas Leela (Canto 10, Chapter 33) was explained by Acharyas as bhakti rasa — symbolic of the soul’s longing for the divine, not a physical affair. Saints like Sri Vallabhacharya and Chaitanya Mahaprabhu emphasized that Krishna’s leelas were spiritual ecstasy, not lust.
- In the Bhagavad Gita (4.9), Krishna says: “One who knows the transcendental nature of My activities does not take rebirth but comes to Me.” His actions are divine, beyond human frailty.
Bhagwan Krishna was the protector of dharma, the slayer of Kamsa, the philosopher of the Gita. To call him adulterous is not a “mistake.” It is a deliberate smear against Sanatan Dharma.
Would Jinto John Dare Mock Virgin Mary or Prophet Muhammad?
Let’s flip the script. If Jinto John had said, “Every woman who gives birth to a child conceived outside marriage is Virgin Mary,” would he still have his job? If he equated immoral men with Islamic figures, would his head be safe on his shoulders? The answer is obviously no.
Hindu Dharma is the only religion where questioning is welcomed and even encouraged.
Religious leaders of Sanatan Dharma love talking about Dharmic philosophy. They encourage respectful discourse to ensure every doubt is assuaged. However, the same cannot be said for Abrahamic faiths. Every other faith asks for blind obedience and punishment for blasphemy. Thus, Congress leaders who can’t question any other faith, vilify Sanatan Dharma. They don’t debate Shri Krishna’s philosophy; they label him as immoral. This is not rational inquiry; it’s planned, deliberate disrespect.
Khangress dares to do so as they know Hindus don’t riot, don’t issue fatwas, don’t burn cities.
Hindus debate with patience – which is exactly what Congress exploits.
Congress’s History of Spitting on Hindu Beliefs
Jinto John is just the latest in a long, filthy line.
- Mani Shankar Aiyar dismissed Lord Ram as “imaginary.”
- Kapil Sibal fought tooth and nail to stop the Ram Mandir, calling the case political.
- Malikarjun Kharge insulted and politicized Mahakumbh.
- Rahul Gandhi labelled Hindus as violent and hate-filled!
- Congress’s 2013 Bill automatically tried to brand Hindus as “terrorists” to win minority votes.
- Sonia Gandhi’s ecosystem stood with those mocking Hindu rituals as superstition while glorifying every other religion’s traditions.
One pattern unites them all: insulting Hindus is safe, easy, and politically profitable.
Will Hindus Stay Silent This Time?
The BJP’s B. Gopalakrishnan was right: “Do not think Hindus will keep silent if anyone defames their deity.”
The name Unnikrishnan is sacred in Kerala households. It evokes the image of child Krishna – the makhan chor, the flute player, the god who delivered the Bhagwad Gita. By twisting it into “adulterer,” Jinto John dragged sacred devotion into the gutter.
His apology called his true hatred of Hindus a mere “slip of the tongue”!
Such an apology is a joke. This wasn’t a slip. It was the true Congress DNA showing in public. And every Hindu must ask: if Congress mocks Krishna today, which god will be insulted tomorrow? The Congress playbook is clear: demonize Hindus, normalize insults, and test how much Hindus can endure.
But the real question is: are Hindus still willing to remain the only community in India mocked without consequence?
