Hrithik Roshan wants the credit for loving Dhurandhar without the courage to stand by its truth. The actor, who once remained silent during national traumas and selectively vocal during fashionable protests, now performs a strange two-platform dance! His conflicted Instagram essay questioning the “politics” of Dhurandhar, and he posts a sanitized X post praising the film’s craft. However, both posts forget to mention Pakistan-sponsored terror.
When Terror Is “Politics”: Hrithik Roshan’s Comfortable Amnesia
Dhurandhar doesn’t invent facts. It doesn’t exaggerate timelines. It simply shows the truth that every Indian lived through: the Kandahar hijack, the Parliament attack, and 26/11. The movie presents open-source proofs that trace back to Pakistan’s state-sheltered terror networks. Yet Hrithik Roshan conveniently calls this “politics,” but only on Instagram!
Hrithik Roshan, who stayed absolutely silent during Operation Sindoor, when India lost lives dismantling terror infrastructure across the border – never once condemning Atankistan and its proxies!
Hrithik Roshan never acknowledged the victims as people who suffered due to Pakistan-funded violence. He only talks of them as victims of a tragedy. His sudden discomfort isn’t born from nuance – it’s born from Urduwood’s selective favoritism to cartels that fund its industry. They happily hold meet and greets organized by ISI-linked Pakistanis in USA, they protest against blacklisting of Pakistani artists that mock Bharat, and they hate any inconvenience in the form of reality.
Dear Hritik – Calling hard truth “politics” is the easiest way to stay friends with everyone while standing for nothing.
The Saba Azaad Factor: When Personal Life Shapes Public Posturing
Let’s address the elephant in the living room. Hrithik Roshan is currently dating Saba Azaad. The woman is known for her LeLi activism, including participation in anti-India protests at JNU. Saba Azaad is a member of the Azaadi Gang, where slogans glorifying urban Naxals and Pakistan-friendly narratives echoed proudly. Her ideological universe has always leaned heavily into the rhetoric that Hrithik Roshan and the rest of Bollywood parrots often.
Hritik Roshan’s attitude is a reflection of Urduwood’s soft scepticism toward Indian security forces, gentle discomfort with Hindu civilizational identity, and instinctive dismissal of nationalist sentiment as “propaganda.”
It becomes impossible to ignore the pattern:
- His filmi dialogues often question Hindu Dharma while showcaing “peaceful” benevolence.
- He willingly starred in Jodhaa Akbar, a film that falsely glorified Mughal rulers.
- And he repeatedly chooses silence when Hindus bleed and noise when fashionable liberal circles demand it.
So when Hrithik Roshan selectively posts only the praising part of his Instagram review on X – carefully removing the line about “disagreeing with the politics” – he isn’t being balanced. He’s being duplicitous under the veneer of diplomacy on social media. He caters to his followers on the two platforms by being celebratory to one set of audiences and apologetic to another.
Hrithik Roshan’s two posts set two different tones that show a lack of spine or conviction.
Splitting Platforms, Splitting Truths: Hrithik Roshan’s Brand Over Bharat
The most telling part of this saga is the split personality of Hrithik’s response. On Instagram, he lectures about “responsibilities of filmmakers as citizens of the world”. He does so on a platform where his industry peers, film critics, and ideological echo chambers roam, hinting that Dhurandhar’s politics make him uncomfortable.
On X – where ordinary Indians, the armed forces, and terror survivors speak – he sticks to praise alone.
A man who truly believes something says it everywhere. A man who fears judgment says it selectively. Hrithik plays safe because safety sells. He may have an upcoming movie release that may face the “cancel culture” of nationalists. Thus, he chooses to protect his investments while flirting with the “Aman ki Asha” brigade that is having a meltdown after the movie’s release.
Dhurandhar doesn’t need Hritik Roshan’s approval – It only needs to prove its mettle on the silver screen as a representation of Atankistan’s dirty deeds!
Aditya Dhar and his movie have the approval of every Indian who remembers 26/11’s burning hotels, Parliament’s breached gates, and the hijacked aircraft. It helps those who have ostrich syndrome face the reality of the horror India faced at the hands of Pakistan.
If portraying these truths “upsets” Hrithik Roshan’s political sensibilities, perhaps it’s his sensibilities – not the film – that need revision.
Dhurandhar speaks truth to terror – Hrithik Roshan speaks truth only to his followers.
And that is the real duplicity of Urduwood!
